10th November 2010 the higher Court of Justice granted permission for judicial review of section 3 to 18 of the act.
Section 3-16
-the act provisions against the act of copyright infringement proved controversial (establish a system of law by which it aims to increase the ease of tracking and suing persistent infringer's. Warning of blocking and reducing quality of users internet through IP address
Section 17 +18
(Blocking internet locations)
this Act allows the secretery of State- with consent of Lord Chancellors (upper and lower) houses of parliment and a court of law- to block access to a location on the internet.
"From which a substantial amount of material has been, is being or is likely to be made available in infringement of copyright"
The Act includes an amendment to the copyright Designs and Parents Act 1988
Ed Vaizey questions challenges to the D.E.A- July 2011 (Dan Worth- The Inquirer)
"The UK media and creative industries will suffer if the D.E.A is not enforced in the consumer hating way it has been written"
Ed Vaizey in the UK internet Minister
He questions the recent legal challenges to the D.E.A which have come from ISP's (BT, Talktalk argue the enforcement of the D.E.A is vital to stop the creative industries from being ripped off). Vaizey said that fact that the challenges were over turned showed how well the D.E.A was written in the first place.
"The attitude of the ISP is quite odd. BT has spent so much time litigating against an Act of Parliment and fallen at every hurdle"
The D.E.A has come in for strong criticism form several quarters, most noteably in a report delivered to the United Nation (U.N) which argued that it will infringe the rights of citizens by cutting off their internet access.



